Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘elections’

Here are some consequences of McCain not being able to think things through beyond what to have for lunch:

1.  Under McCain Feingold, Ronald Reagan could never have become President because most of his early campaign was paid for by a couple of rich Republican businessmen, who today could only give $1,250 each.

2.  McCain’s law restricts elections to the two large, evil parties because only they have the staff needed to get around and evade the restrictions of the law. A brand new TEA Party candidate has no idea on earth how to recruit and organize hundreds of criminals to collect addresses of innocent people who are not able to contribute to political campaigns because they are poor. Acorn members and their neighbors are a perfect example. The Los Angeles Times found that Hillary Clinton’s 2007 Presidential Primary Campaign had the maximum $2,500 per married couple contribution from every person living in the poorest neighborhood of New York’s Chinatown. The LA Times reporters went to the addresses and often found that Hillary’s donors were not known to live at the address given on her reports to the FEC. Others included dishwashers who spoke no English and had no Green Card nor citizenship, and could not possibly have accumulated $2,500 to give to an American election.

Another example is Obama’s staff turned off the security feature for credit card contributions that verifies the cardholder’s names and addresses. That made it possible for one person using one credit card to donate $2,500 for an imaginary married couple, giving a different false name, address and employer for each donation. They also turned off the feature of the software program that resaved the credit card number!

So one person, using the same credit card, could contribute to Obama $2,500 for John and Mary Doe, 123 Main Street, employed at Acme electronics, and then contribute another $2,500 for John and Mary Fawn, 234 Main St, employed at Yellow electronics. Then the same person and credit card could contribute $2,500 for John and Mary Brown, 345 Main St, employed at Red Electronics, etc., etc., etc.

This was reported in major national newspapers and to the Federal Election Commission, which said since the credit card numbers had not been saved because of a “malfunction” in Obama’s software, they had no way to investigate the charges, so no harm, no foul.

Let me guarantee you that if a TEA Party candidate pulled something like that, the TEA Party candidate would be in jail. Well, if we cheated on our taxes like Obama’s best friends and appointees did, we would be in jail. If pigs had wings, it would not be safe to walk outside. Plop, plop. Borat’s droppings are falling from the sky on top of our heads.

Read Full Post »

Look what Nancy Goldfarb found CLICK HERE

Read Full Post »

From the beginning of his falsely labeled “community organizer” career Obama was a paid crook. He never volunteered on anything. He is a taker, not a givere. He was paid salaries and bribes for every breath he took in his life.

http://mcauleysworld.wordpress.com/2008/09/24/what-is-acorn-why-is-acorn-associated-with-voter-fraud-does-obama-have-an-acorn-connection/

Read Full Post »

In 2005 John McCain wrote a law and introduced it in the Senate to reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

As one of his early acts as a Senator, and to prove his claims of bipartisanship cooperation are false, Barack Obama voted against McCain’s reform law.

Fannie Mae gave Obama $165,000.

After Obama got the money, he lied and said he wanted to reform Fannie Mae.

The Senate has no record of Obama ever introducing any such law.

Barack Hussein Obama practices the Muslim principle of lying to your enemies, which seems to include the American voters.

 

Read Full Post »

“Change You Can Believe In” apparently means changing American elections to a new low.

Barack Obama is actually more of the same. The same old, same old.

Obama rarely smiles, but he had a big smile while he insulted all women everywhere in the world by describing the history-making woman Vice Presidential candidate and the only governor in the nation with a 65% approval rating as a “Pig with Lipstick.”

Here is the original post at the terrific new blog http://ngoldfarb.wordpress.com/

Credit to Nancy Goldfarb:

Obama Sinks to New Low, Obama Calls Sarah Palin A “Pig”

Senator Barack Obama wants to change the way Washington works. He claims he wants to change politics, so that we can all work together.

Yet there is not a single example in his history where he has crossed the aisle for bipartisanship.

In fact he has no history of ever doing anything. Except writing his memoirs. TWICE.

So we can only judge him by his words. In his own words: “Words matter.” In the absence of having ever accomplished anything, we can only judge him on what he says.

Now, when the Republicans had differences with the major Democratic lady candidate, they argued the issues. Republican candidates and elected officials never called Hillary names.

Senator Barack Obama, as the Democrat at the top of the ticket, who wants to lead America to “restore our reputation in the world,” has set a genuinely new standard for political discourse in the Westen World of civilized nations.

Unfortunately, the Obama standard is noteworthy in that it defines not a new high, but a new low for political conduct.

In no civilized nation do any high ranking candidates of any political party refer to their female opponents as pigs with lipstick.

No Republican member of the Senate, the House or a Governor has ever called Hillary Clinton or Geraldine Ferraro a pig. Never. Republicans never sink that low.

But Obama sinks that low.

Does anyone seriously want a President who calls women who disagree with him a “PIG?”

Obama has lowered the glass ceiling.

Obama has insulted every woman in America.

Obama has insulted every American by lowering our national debates into the gutter, thereby defining himself as a gutter person.

Clearly, Senator Obama is an inhabitant of the gutter.

Do not let Barack Obama drag us, drag our beloved Nation, down into the gutter.”

Thank you Nancy

Read Full Post »

Look what I stumbled across?

Michelle Obama has her Chief of Staff out in MSNBC on prime time referring to the reproductive parts of women who belong in a silo if we support Sarah Palin!

http://kyracohen.wordpress.com/

And making it sound like a put down to shop at Walmart.

Obama is losing the election.

He, his, wife and her Chief of Staff are elitist snobs that stoop to sexist attacks on women who dare to disagree with them. Obama looks down on anyone who is not like him

Well, not only am I not like him in attacking women based on their “Reproductive parts”, I do not like him.

Referring to attracting women to Gov. Palin as “putting women in a silo” is so out of touch with America that the two Obama’s should not be allowed in the White House on an Easter Tour.

Read Full Post »