Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘mortgage bailout’

 

The Left’s response to Tax Day Tea Party events has been pure Saul Alinsky Rules for Radicals: Ridicule. But in the Chicago socialist’s day, the tool kit did not include embedding bogus newsie posers at opposition events.

Beware such chicanery today.

Here is a sample dishonest plan from the Obama Left On How They Plan To Disrespect our Tea Parties:

__________________

From DKos via MM:

Tomorrow, my husband and I will be venturing into the wilds disguised as a news crew to do some in person interviewers with teabaggers here in Rhode Island (if we can find any) … We’re going to ask open ended questions that seem to have a slight conservative bent to (hopefully) get them to open up and just start ranting. Then, we take any examples of racism, hatred, ignorance, and stupidity that we catch on camera and make a little movie out of it. Probably a YouTube special. Here’s the list we have so far

* What are you celebrating (The Boston Tea Party), and can you explain its historical relevance? [We’re hoping to get some hilarious flubs from this one]

* Do you approve of Michael Steele’s plan to expand the GOP through a “hip-hop urban-suburban marketing strategy”? [hoping to get some juicy racist stuff from this question]

* (as an intentional misunderstanding/follow up, presuming that someone complains about wasteful government spending) “So you disapprove of your tax dollars going to the Iraq War?” [should elicit some confusion]

Anyways, it’s a start… but I’d love to have some suggestions for questions that sound fine, but should prompt an outpouring of crazy.”

 ______________

This is typical Obama dishonesty. Instead of  dealing with the issues, Obamaites attack the people, insult us, make fun of us, disrespect our right to free speech.

Obama is killing democracy with these tactics.

This is George Orwell 1984 censorship for the Obama “Department of Truth”

More at:

http://taxdayteaparty.com/2009/04/beware-typical-newsie-posers/

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

People should ask: just what are the hedge fund buddies of Geithner adding to the economy under this plan?

Geithner’s drinking buddies are putting up ten percent of the money, but are getting a government guarantee against losses.

Taxpayers are putting up most of the money plus guaranteeing Obama’s contributors against most losses.

SO WHY INVOLVE OBAMA’S CONTRIBUTORS AT ALL?

If they are not putting up the money in size or taking the risk, why is Obama making them rich? Because they contributed to his campaign?

It appears as if Geithner’s drinking buddies will get almost all the potential gains in exchange for putting up almost none of the money!

Just another case of crooked politicians making their buddies rich at the taxpayers expenses.

Change you can believe in. No other politician ever dared such a rape of the taxpayers to benefit his political contributors.

Read Full Post »

No business cycle is complete until corporate tech budgets have been slashed, and no bear market has ever been completed until tech stocks have been wiped out.

Corporate tech budgets have barely been touched so far, but the Semiconductor Industry association has said new orders for chips are down 50 percent.

When revised figures for tech budgets for business come out soon, the tech heavy Nasdaq will slash and burn.

Today, Firday march 6, 2009, Nasdaq opened higher, then by 11 AM had retreated 40 points off its high. I predict a  lower Nasdaq close than the current 1,279.

Many Nasdaq giants such as Mister Softee and Intel are major components of the S&P 500 Index, so it is likely to drop to 600 from its current 676.

Obama told us to buy stocks a few days ago. Sure hope he knows more about the economy than that FUBAR.

Read Full Post »

Both ideas are Brainless Barry at his best/worst. One of eight mortgages are delinquent or in foreclosure. The S&P Index just gave the strongest sell signal of the last hundred years.

Barack Obama’s plans will make everybody think there is no penalty for cheating on your finances, whether it is in business, your banks, your mortgages, car loans, whatever, nothing matters, Brainless Barry will bail you out.

We need programs to reward personal responsibility, not misbehavior.

We need people who do not pay to lose their homes, and businesses to go bankrupt. Why are not all the crooked executives getting fired and prosecuted?

I scrimped, budgeted, planned and saved, yet i am the only class being punished. I cannot earn any interest on my savings. My stocks are worth Obama’s BS ass droppings. Obama is going to increase my income taxes, capital gain taxes (on what?) and his cow fart tax and carbon tax is going to inflate what I pay for oatmeal and bananas, electricity, etc.

Who killed America?

How do we find a real President to lead this country?

Read Full Post »

Welfare leech Nadya Suleman could not get a home to live in without fraud and leeching off her bankrupt mother. She lied to Dr. Phil and claimed she did not want multiples, she just wanted one more baby.

Give her the benefit of the doubt, which is what the State of California has been doing for many years, and assume she is telling the truth (not likely).

So she only wanted a singleton birth.

But wait. She lived in a home (a) that is not hers and (b) is $23,000 behind on the mortgage. So she was not able to provide a home for her first six brats.

And she “needed” a seventh?

She has not worked for around ten years; got a questionable workman’s comp claim (whiplash from a desk?); foodstamps; Aid to Dependent Children; and Aid to the Disabled.

Her bankrupt Mom says Nadya never helped with the mortgage.

And she got $30,000 of plastic surgery and “needed” a seventh child?

Should Medicaid be amended to have mandatory abortions required of serial welfare frauds?

Can America afford monsters like this when OBambi is mortgaging our children for more and more welfare.

Should Obama’s food stamp mother been forced to have an abortion?

Read Full Post »

Is the term “Global Warming” or “US Warming?” Obama’s new carbon tax is only on US employers. China and India, etc., get to keep on polluting, while Obama makes US companies pay a carbon tax.

So US businesses now have to pay yet another tax that their foreign competitiors do not, futher pricing American goods out of the world markets.

For Acorn members, let me explain that. The more anything Made In America costs, the less people buy it. People will buy the cheaper stuff made in China where there is no carbon tax.

This means less jobs in America.

It also means MORE GLOBAL WARMING because everything will be made in nations that have no pollution controls.

So why doesn’t Obama have a global tax on carbon dioxide?

Good work, food stamp president!

You found another way to reduce jobs in America and turn our recession into a full blown depression.

Change You Can Believe In.

Go Obama Go!

Read Full Post »

The PhD commenter below has refused to understand that the actions of Presidents Carter and Clinton, in cooperation with a young lawyer named Barack Obama, more than ten years ago could have caused a legal and moral situation that built up over time and finally fed upon itself in the financial excesses that are destroying the entire world today.

This PhD believed that, since the thirty year trend of building, self-nourishing, moral and financial disease, combined with Carter’s CRA that requires banks to lend more and more to unqualified buyers, reached a fevered peak during Bush’s administration, that Bush was the cause of the disaster.

He cannot comprehend that CCCCO (CuCoo Carter Clinton and Obama) created the legal framework and regulatory environment that enabled and even DEMANDED the financial misbehavior of the apocalypse.

While Bush is certainly guilty of being too stupid to perceive the disease and cut it short, so are all the people that Obama has appointed to cure it. For example, Tim Geithner, whom Obama calls the only man who can save us, was in fact asleep at the switch when he, as head of the New York Federal Reserve Bank,  was in charge on preventing the collapse, and DID NOT. Yet Obama relies on Timmie for our salvation?

Here is the medical educator argueing with me on the efficiency of our medical system. Is it no wonder that the students who come out of our current educational system vote for the food stamp president?

Medical Second Opinions

PhD Commenter: Since I have a Ph.D., it doesn’t intimidate me in the least. (that I disagreed with him)

 

Host: That you claim a PhD is not surprising – you should get a refund from your schools, undergraduate and high schools, as well as PhD factories.

 

Don’t get me started on the incompetence of doctors and the failures of the US Medical Educational System.

 

PhD Commenter:  Sure, go on about the medical education system, as if you really know anything about it. The most you have is a few personal anecdotes. Let’s hear them, and I’m sure they’ll have nothing to do with the doctor’s education or medical knowledge, but what the heck.

 

Host: Regarding doctors’ competency and the state of the medical profession, more than one third of the time we get a second opinion, it recommends different treatment.

 

That is not acceptable.

 

PhD Commenter:  And yes, it is acceptable. It is very acceptable. For one thing, when a second opinion is sought, either the diagnosis or the treatment is in question. For any given set of symptoms and test results, there is often more than one possible diagnosis. For any given diagnosis, there is almost always more than one option for treatment. That is just the way it is and will continue to be as long as medicine is advancing. It is even the truth that one medical institution gets better results with one treatment and another gets better results with another.

 

Host: One of my biggest gripes is how dysfunctional our college system is, and how our Food Stamp President keeps throwing more money into it instead of shutting it down and starting all over

 

Well, you certainly make me feel better.

 

Thanks for that treatment.

 

But seriously, if I understand your comment, if I am receiving a treatment from one facility and am not getting good results, then I could go to another doctor and get the same treatment with a different result?

 

And if I go for a second opinion, then I might get another variety of treatment from a third facility.

 

And if that does not go well, perhaps a fourth facility could give the second treatment with different results than the third facility?

 

Is there a limit on the number of places/doctors I need to see/pay before I get cured? Or before I get killed?

 

Does the scientific principle of replicable results enter into this?

 

By the way, four doctors and four treatment/outcomes for the same medical condition/disease are not as unusual as anyone might think/fear!

 

 Many patients see more than four doctors before getting correctly diagnosed and cured.

 

The newspapers, golf clubs, condo associations, country clubs and the internet are full of histories that take many, many doctors before a cure is encountered.

 

It is not acceptable to dismiss such things as “that is the way it is” or as merely “anecdotal evidence.”

 

Actually, many doctors admit that three or more doctors may be required before finding the working/curing treatment for 15 to 20 percent of patients.

 

My own family’s “anecdotal” evidence consists of more than thirty doctors for four people covering 95 years, and includes three instances (for four people) where doctors insisted on immediate operations that were not necessary or appropriate. Did they teach the spelling of “malpractice” in your PhD thesis?

 

One doctor screamed at me at the top of his voice that if I did not let him operate on me tomorrow, I would die.

 

I refused and am living very happily. Another doctor cured the condition with antibiotics costing $47 compared to the $30,000 the surgeon wanted to waste, forget the pain, suffering, and risks of surgery, including the very real risk of infection in our filthy hospitals.

 

Our family declined all three operations, and has lived very healthily without them, although it did take three doctors a bit longer to pay off their yachts.

 

I believe our medical schools, doctors, and medical boards are in need of even more drastic reform than our financial and governmental systems, all of which are so broken they cannot be fixed, but need to be totally discarded and reinvented.

PS Later the “Educator Of Doctors” Replied that one way to improve medicine was to give doctors free magazine subscriptions.

Presumably they might read them on their yachts bought with unnecessary operations.

 

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »